From Terry.Dontje@XXXXXXX Wed Feb 6 06:24:36 2008 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:03:22 -0500 From: Terry Dontje In-reply-to: <00da01c86446$8ef3f4a0$860add8c@XXXXXXXXXXX>To: "Mailing list for discussion of MPI 2.1" Message-id: <47A9A20A.10303@XXXXXXX>MIME-version: 1.0 References: <00da01c86446$8ef3f4a0$860add8c@XXXXXXXXXXX>User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) X-Spam-Details: rule=tag_notspam policy=tag score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=3.1.0-0801230000 definitions=main-0802050046 X-Spam-OrigSender: Terry.Dontje@XXXXXXX X-Spam-Bar: Subject: Re: [mpi-21] Two MPI I/O questions X-BeenThere: mpi-21@XXXXXXXXXXX X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Mailing list for discussion of MPI 2.1" List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of MPI 2.1" List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: mpi-21-bounces@XXXXXXXXXXX Errors-To: mpi-21-bounces@XXXXXXXXXXX X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mailgw.mcs.anl.gov I talked with Len and we believe topic one has already been addressed previously and the second topic does not need to be clarified. --td Rajeev Thakur wrote: > I don't think any clarification is needed for the second topic. > > Rajeev > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rolf Rabenseifner [mailto:rabenseifner@XXXXXXXX >> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 6:22 AM >> To: mpi-21@XXXXXXXXXXX >> Cc: Leonard F. Wisniewski; Rajeev Thakur >> Subject: Re: Two MPI I/O questions >> >> Mainly to Leonard Wisniewski and Rajeev Thakur >> who have contributed to this mail-discussion thread. >> >> This is a follow up to: >> Shared File Pointers >> in >> http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/homes/wgropp/projects/parallel/MPI/mpi- >> errata/index.html >> with mail discussion in >> >> http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/homes/wgropp/projects/parallel/MPI/mpi- >> errata/discuss/sharedfile/ >> >> and here only to the second topic in the mails. >> (The first topic is handled in the thread >> "MPI C++ Constants conflict with stdio") >> >> _________________________________________ >> >> When I understand correctly, then a clarification is not needed >> in the MPI standard. >> >> If somebody wants a clarification to be included into the standard >> and therefore in Ballot 4, please send me your wording >> with the page and line references included. >> >> If all agree, that no clarification is needed, then I would finish >> this discussion-thread. >> >> Best regards >> Rolf >> >> >> >> Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner@XXXXXXX >> High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 >> University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 >> Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner >> Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30) >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-21 mailing list > mpi-21@XXXXXXXXXXX > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/mpi-21 > _______________________________________________ mpi-21 mailing list mpi-21@XXXXXXXXXXX http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/mpi-21